1. Hostile Advisors: Prevalence, Forms, and Consequences of Abusive Supervision in Doctoral Education

Hostile Advisors: Prevalence, Forms, and Consequences of Abusive Supervision in Doctoral Education

April 2025 | American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting
Yiran Chen, Yiping Bai, Heeyun Kim, John Gonzalez 

This study investigates the prevalence, forms, and consequences of abusive supervision in doctoral education. We conceptualize abusive supervision as doctoral students’ perceptions of sustained hostile behaviors from advisors. We analyzed survey data from 2,101 doctoral students at a major research university, finding that 5.8 to 12.4 percent of them experienced abusive supervision, depending on classification criteria. Among demographic factors, gender emerged as the sole significant predictor, with women more likely to be classified in this category. While abusive supervision is initially associated with adverse student outcomes, these relationships dissipated after controlling for mentoring support, suggesting that insufficient mentoring—rather than overt hostility—drives detrimental student outcomes. However, caution is warranted as sample limitations like survivorship bias and selective participation may lead to underestimation of abusive supervision’s prevalence and impact.